2025 ITPM Results: 125% Return & $500K+ NAV Using Anton Kreil’s System
- The Institute Trader

- Oct 8
- 5 min read

🚀 From Profitable to Professional: Year 3 Was the Breakthrough
Coming into 2025, I was profitable — but not consistently at scale.
So I made a decision: review every trade I had ever taken.
This wasn’t a surface-level review. I dove deep into my entries, exits, structures, and decision-making to uncover hidden flaws that had been undermining my edge.
What I found wasn’t pretty, but it was powerful.
🔎 The Flaws That Were Holding Me Back
Through backtesting and journaling, I uncovered several major issues:
Incorrect option structures — poor delta targeting, expiry mismatch, inconsistent positioning
Timing was random — I had no structured entry methodology
I wasn’t cutting or repairing trades when needed
Risk wasn’t predefined — I lacked clear sizing rules on entries
And perhaps most importantly, I was leaving money on the table due to hesitation, unclear frameworks, and mental friction
These issues weren’t just costing me money — they were eroding confidence. So I rebuilt everything.
✅ The Fix: Merging My Setups with ITPM's Long/Short Framework
I committed fully to the Institute of Trading and Portfolio Management (ITPM) structure, led by Anton Kreil.
I took the key principles from ITPM — macro thematics, top-down sector alignment, risk control, and long/short balancing — and merged them with my personal strategies.
Here’s what changed:
I implemented structured option setups with delta targeting, proper expiry logic, and tight risk control
I created timing rules based on top-down analysis
I built in processes to cut, repair, or recycle trades
I committed to long/short portfolio construction and continuous sector monitoring
Every trade had risk predefined and was aligned with my broader book
It wasn’t about finding magic setups — it was about building a system I could trust, repeat, and scale.
🧠 Psychology Means Nothing Without a System
Here’s something that became crystal clear this year:
Psychology doesn’t matter if you don’t have a systematic edge.
Retail traders love to talk about mindset. But in most cases, what they think is a “psychology issue” is actually a process issue.
Instead of working on affirmations or discipline hacks, most traders would do far better if they just:
Reviewed their past trades
Identified patterns in their behavior
Looked at how they handled risk and execution
Noted what they did during losses vs. wins
That’s where psychology reveals itself — in your trade history.
Once I built a system grounded in rules, structure, and predefined risk, my emotions took a backseat. Trading became objective. I didn’t need to "feel better" — I just needed to follow my process.
“The best way to fix your psychology is to stop relying on it to trade.”
🔍 ITPM Sector Focus: You Don’t Need to Know Everything
Here’s another lesson from 2025 that ITPM drilled into me:
You don’t need to understand every sector or every stock to make money.
You won’t catch me trading biotech stocks — because I don’t fully understand them. And I don’t need to.
My focus is always: Where is the capital flowing?
That’s the essence of the ITPM top-down process:
Start with macro themes
Drill into the sectors being rewarded or punished
Build exposure accordingly — long where capital is going, short where it’s leaving
This alone keeps me aligned with institutional capital and avoids unnecessary complexity. It’s not about trading everything — it’s about trading what matters.
💻 From Spreadsheets to Software: Managing My Portfolio Like a Business
One of the biggest changes I made this year wasn’t just in how I traded — it was how I monitored and managed my risk.
I moved away from clunky Excel spreadsheets and built my own portfolio management software to track exposure in real time.
I needed a more sophisticated, visual solution to manage risk like a professional.
Here’s what my software does:
Tracks exposure by sector and bias (long/short)
Flags expiry clusters to avoid calendar risk
Monitors swing exposure and daily portfolio fluctuations
Calculates delta-adjusted risk across the book
Helps me spot overcrowded positions or correlated trades

Before this, my Excel workflow was slow and unclear. I’d waste time interpreting messy data, which created hesitation.
Now, with one dashboard, I get real-time clarity on what my portfolio is doing, what risks I’m holding, and where I need to adjust.
This tool allowed me to shift from trading setups — to managing a portfolio like a business.
📊 2025 Performance Summary
Metric | Value |
Total Trades | 122 |
Wins | 49 (40.16%) |
Losses | 73 (59.84%) |
YTD Return | +125% |
Net Realized P&L | $271,878 |
Current NAV | $502,878 |
Risk/Reward Ratio | 3.41:1 |
Average Gain Per Win | +98% |
Average Loss Per Trade | -17% |
Avg Holding Period | 11.6 Days |
Avg Positions Held | 10 |
On September 16th, I posted an article detailing how I grew my account from $25K to $400K.
Since then — in just a few weeks — I’ve added another $100,000 to the account, now sitting at $502,878 NAV.
That kind of compounding doesn’t happen without a robust process behind it.
🎟️ Want to Learn More About ITPM?
If this journey resonates with you — if you’re starting to see how structure, risk management, and proper trade construction can change your outcomes — then I’d highly recommend looking into ITPM.
📌 I’ve written full reviews of the ITPM programs, shared my personal experience, and even created a discounts page for traders who want to get started.
This education changed everything for me. It might do the same for you.
🧠 Final Thoughts: From Randomness to Repeatability
2025 was the year everything clicked.
Not because of luck. Not because of better trades. But because I finally committed to process over prediction.
I removed randomness. I stopped guessing. I treated trading like a business — and the results followed.
“You don’t rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems.” – James Clear
With a solid system, everything changed. And now, heading into 2026, I’ve never been more confident in my ability to stay consistent and scale.
🔗 Resources Worth Exploring
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or other professional advice. The content reflects the personal opinions of the author based on publicly available information at the time of writing and should not be relied upon as the basis for any investment decisions. Earnings reviews may contain forward-looking statements that are inherently uncertain and subject to change.
Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and due diligence, and to consult with a qualified financial advisor or licensed professional before making any investment or trading decisions. The author and publisher make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided and accept no liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on the information herein.






